假定英语课上老师要求同桌之间交换修改作文，请你修改你同桌写的以下作文。文中共有10处语言错误,每句中最多有两处。每处错误仅涉及一个单词的增加、删除或修改。
增加：在缺词处加个漏字符号（∧）,并在其下面写出该加的词。
删除：把多余的词用斜线（ \ ）划掉。
修改：在错的词下划一横线，并在该词下面写出修改后的词。
注意：1. 每处错误及其修改均限一词；
2. 只允许修改10处，多者（从11处起）不计分。
A chemical factory lies near my home. The manager of the factory was criticized by the government because the factory gives out lots of harmful smoke on every day, but he paid no attention. Then the factory was forced to stop production and the manager said angry, “Is there any evidences to show that we did harm to people’s health? In fact, we didn’t.” Just then, doctor came, with the result of the medical exam, say the manager was suffering from lung cancer. That is very clear that the pollution has harmed not only the people around the factory and also the manager himself. The manager regretted having caused so many pollution. Now he has realized what important it is to keep the air clean.
阅读下面短文，在空白处填入1个适当的单词或括号内单词的正确形式。
It 1.debate) for years: Are eggs good or bad for you? People who eat an added three or four eggs a week or 300 milligrams of dietary cholesterol (胆固醇) per day, have a higher risk of both heart disease and early death compared with those who eat 2. (few) eggs, new research finds.
“Eggs, 3. (special) the yolk, are a major source of dietary cholesterol,” wrote Victor Zhong. In 4. study published Friday in the medical journal JAMA 5. there are many unexpected reports, he and his colleagues noted that a single large egg contains about 186 milligrams of cholesterol. Over the follow-up period, a total of 5400 cardiovascular (心血管的) 6. (event) occurred, including 1302 fatal and nonfatal strokes, 1, 897 incidents of fatal and nonfatal heart 7. (fail) and 113 other heart disease deaths. An additional 6132 participants died of other causes. 8. (consume) an additional 300 milligrams of dietary cholesterol per day was associated 9. a 3.2% higher risk of heart disease and a 4.4% higher risk of early death, Zhong’s analysis of the data showed.
“Eggs are a nutritious food. While this study focuses on the amount we’re eating, it’s just as important 10. (pay) attention to how the eggs are cooked and to the trimmings that come with them,” said Taylor, who was not involved in the research.
I understood Chinese cultures only seen on TV and in books but only made little headway learning Chinese. _______ , it did not matter. The patience, generosity and _______ of strangers left me pleasantly surprised with Beijing.
I _______ needed Chinese On my birthday, for example, I was _______ in the city. Everyone I knew was out of town, so I decided to _______ a day of it myself. I went shopping. After three happy hours, I went confidently up to the _______and for a minute, I _______ everyone spoke English.
But after _______ my items, the woman behind the counter spoke in Chinese, and all I could do was stare _______.I thought she was asking cash or card, so I pulled out some notes, but she ________ her head. We stood there for a few minutes ________ another cashier said, “A couple of your ________ are part of the sale and cannot be exchanged or ________ once bought.”
Another day, I went to the police station as I had lost my wallet in a ________ land During that 20-minute talk, I realized the eagerness and ________ of people.
Speaking in a mix of Chinese and English, the young police officer did all he could to put me ________. He knew that as foreigners we were nervous at the police station, so he smiled and spoke. In the end, the ________ took a couple of hours and the wallet did not ________ anymore. I had made a friend.
There are many ________ and unforgettable memories of getting by without ________ , but perhaps without the friends help, Beijing may not have been so easy to navigate.
1.A. Lastly B. However C. Instead D. Thus
2.A. sacrifice B. efforts C. warmth D. promise
3.A. rarely B. basically C. completely D. totally
4.A. still B. even C. only D. alone
5.A. make B. need C. do D. plan
6.A. exit B. store C. counter D. hall
7.A. realized B. recognized C. guaranteed D. assumed
8.A. ringing up B. showing up C. assessing D. examining
9.A. poorly B. helplessly C. quickly D. patiently
10.A. waved B. nodded C. shook D. hung
11.A. until B. as C. after D. for
12.A. expenses B. purchases C. supplies D. parcels
13.A. accepted B. canceled C. returned D. broken
14.A. foreign B. same C. different D. new
15.A. happiness B. wisdom C. excitement D. kindness
16.A. for sure B. at ease C. in order D. in place
17.A. incident B. procedure C. question D. survey
18.A. matter B. stay C. change D. return
19.A. interesting B. amusing C. pleasant D. admiring
20.A. cell phone B. police officers C. Chinese D. cashiers
How You Open Your Car Door Matters to Cyclists
The “Dutch Reach” isn’t a new dance move or a random You Tube challenge. 1. And you might keep your car door safe in the process, too. All you have to do is change how you open your door.
Typically, a person sitting in the driver’s seat of a car opens the door with the hand closest to it. It makes sense since doors are designed to be opened that way. Pull the handle and the door is open. But if you happen to do that at the wrong time, you may unknowingly create an obstacle for a passing cyclist. The cyclist might be knocked down off the bike. 2. Clearly, the solution is for the person exiting the vehicle to check for traffic. However, the car door design and long-time habits have made the process automatically. 3. Open your car door with your other hand using the Dutch Reach. So instead of using your left hand, reach for the door handle with your right. This will force you to turn your body. At the very least, you’ll look into your side view mirror to check for any traffic.
4. All Dutch are taught it. It’s part of regular driver education. The technique dates back about 50 or 60 years in the Netherlands. In 2016 an American named Michael Charney started the Dutch Reach Project. He wanted to popularize the practice in the United States. Charney’s efforts may be paying off. 5.
A. The car door is likely to be damaged by the fast-moving bicycle.
B. The Dutch are used to opening their car doors this way.
C. Several states now include the Dutch Reach in their drivers’ handbooks.
D. It’s a simple move that can help prevent harm to cyclists.
E. People are trying to change the way to open the car.
F. It is easy to do once you are used to it.
G. Luckily, there’s a simple way to solve the problem.
“Does my smile look big in this?” Future fitting-room mirrors in clothing stores could subtly adjust your reflection to make you look--and hence feel--happier encouraging you to like what you see.
That’s the idea behind the Emotion Evoking System developed by Shigeo Yoshida and colleagues at the University of Tokyo in Japan. The system can manipulate, or in other words, control your emotions and personal preferences by presenting you with an image of your own smiling or frowning face.
The principle that physiological changes can drive emotional ones that laughter comes before happiness, rather than the other way around- is a well-established idea.
The researchers wanted to see if this idea could be used to build a computer system that manipulates how you feel. The system works by presenting the user with a web-camera image of his or her face as if they were looking in a mirror. The image is then subtly altered with-software, turning the corners of the mouth up or down and changing the area around the eyes, so that the person appears to smile or frown.
Without telling them the aim of the study, the team recruited(招募)21 volunteers and asked them to sit in front of the screen while performing an unrelated task. When the task was completed, the participants rated how they felt. When the faces on screen appeared to smile, people reported that they felt happier. On the other hand, when the image was given a sad expression, they reported feeling less happy.
Yoshida and his colleagues tested whether manipulating the volunteers emotional state would influence their preferences. Each person was given a scarf to wear and again presented with the altered webcam image. The volunteers that saw themselves smiling while wearing the scarf were more likely to report that they liked it, and those that saw themselves not smiling were less likely.
“The system could be used to manipulate consumers’ impressions of products,” say the researchers. For example, mirrors in clothing-store fitting rooms could be replaced with screens showing altered reflections. They also suggest people may be more likely to find clothes attractive if they see themselves looking happy while trying them on.
“It’s certainly an interesting area,” says Chris Creed at the University of Birmingham, UK. But he notes that using such technology in a shop would be harder than in the lab, because people will use a wide range of expressions. “Attempting to make slight differences to these and ensuring that the reflected image looks believable would be much more challenging,” he says.
Of course, there are also important moral questions surrounding such subtly manipulative technology. “You could argue that if it makes people happy, what harm is it doing?” says Creed. “But I can imagine that many people may feel manipulated uncomfortable and cheated if they found out.”
1.What’s the main purpose of the Emotion Evoking System?
A. To see whether one’ s facial expressions can be altered.
B. To replace the mirrors in future clothing-store fitting rooms.
C. To see whether laughter comes before happiness.
D. To see whether one’s feeling can be unconsciously affected.
2.What can we learn about the web-camera image in the study?
A. It recorded the volunteers’ performance in the task.
B. It attempted to make the volunteers feel happier.
C. It gave the volunteers a false image.
D. It beautified the volunteers appearance in the mirror.
3.What does Creed mention as a limitation of the technology
A. It only deals with a limited number of facial expressions.
B. It only works in clothing stores.
C. It only makes subtle changes to people’s expressions.
D. It only changes the areas around the mouth and the eyes.
4.What does Creeds comment on the moral issues with this technology imply?
A. People should make their decisions independently.
B. Technology is unable to manipulate people.
C. Nothing is more important than happiness.
D. People should neglect the harm of the technology.
Everybody loves a fat pay rise. Yet pleasure at your own can vanish if you learn that a colleague has been given a bigger one. Indeed, if he has a reputation for slacking, you might even be outraged. Such behaviour is regarded as “all too human,” with the underlying assumption that other animals would not be capable of this finely developed sense of grievance(不满,不平). But a study by Sarah Brosnan and Frans de Waal of Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia, which has just been published in Nature, suggests that it is all too monkey, as well.
The researchers studied the behaviour of female brown capuchin monkeys. They look cute. They are good-natured, co-operative creatures, and they share their food readily. Above all, like their female human counterparts, they tend to pay much closer attention to the value of “goods and services” than males.
Such characteristics make them perfect candidates for Dr. Brosnan’s and Dr. de Waals study. The researchers spent two years teaching their monkeys to exchange tokens for food. Normally, the monkeys were happy enough to exchange pieces of rock for slices of cucumber. However, when two monkeys were placed in separate but adjoining chambers, so that each could observe what the other was getting in return for its rock, their behaviour became markedly different.
In the world of capuchins, grapes are luxury goods (and much preferable to cucumbers). So when one monkey was handed a grape in exchange for her token, the second was reluctant to hand hers over for a mere piece of cucumber. And if one received a grape without having to provide her token in exchange at all, the other either tossed her own token at the researcher or out of the chamber, or refused to accept the slice of cucumber. Indeed, the mere presence of a grape in the other chamber(without an actual monkey to eat it) was enough to induce resentment(愤恨)in a female capuchin.
The researchers suggest that capuchin monkeys, like humans, are guided by social emotions. In the wild, they are a co-operative, group-living species. Such cooperation is likely to be stable only when each animal feels it is not being cheated. Feelings of righteous indignation(愤慨), it seems, are not the preserve of people alone. Refusing a lesser reward completely makes these feelings abundantly clear to other members of the group. However, whether such a sense of fairness evolved independently in capuchins and humans, or whether it stems from the common ancestor that the species had 35 million years ago, is, as yet, an unanswered question.
1.In the opening paragraph, the author introduces his topic by ________.
A. making a comparison B. justifying an assumption
C. making a conclusion D. explaining a phenomenon
2.The statement “it is all too monkey” (Last line, Paragraph I) implies that ________.
A. resenting unfairness is also monkeys nature
B. monkeys are also outraged by slack rivals
C. monkeys, like humans, tend to be jealous of each other
D. no animals other than monkeys can develop such emotions
3.Dr. Brosnan and Dr. de Waal have eventually found in their study that the monkeys ________.
A. prefer grapes to cucumbers
B. will not be co-operative if feeling cheated
C. can be taught to exchange things
D. are unhappy when separated from others
4.What can we infer from the last paragraph?
A. Monkeys can be trained to develop social emotions.
B. Cooperation among monkeys remains stable only in the wild.
C. Animals usually show their feelings openly as humans do.
D. Human indignation evolved from an uncertain source.
