1.How long will the exhibition last?
A.Five days. B.Seven days.
C.Nine days. D.Eleven days.
2.What will you get for free every day if you’re among the first 500?
A.A magazine. B.A ticket for a magic show.
C.A great bargain. D.A chance to join in games.
3.If you come with your family at 3 p.m., you’ll enjoy the programme________.
A.Games and Quizzes. B.Lucky Draw
C.Drama on Fun with jokes D.Story Telling
4.For more information about the exhibition, you can_______.
A.call the organizer B.write to the company
C.visit the website D.e-mail the publisher
假设你是红星中学学生李华。你和同学在寒假期间去医院参加了志愿者活动，请按照以下四幅图的先后顺序，给校刊英语角写一篇英文稿件，介绍此次经历。
注意：词数不少于60。
提示词：自助挂号机 self-service registration machine
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
翻译下列句子
1.在浏览网页时，我碰巧看到一则大量需要志愿者的招募信息。
2.被分配了不同的任务之后，我们赶紧开始工作。
3.随后，我们全身心投入到制作中。按照蓝图，我们将机翼和轮子附在飞机模型上，还安装了发动机。
翻译下列短语
1.上网搜索相关信息
2.考虑到所有学生的建议
3.达成一致做某事
4.通过头脑风暴提出很多建议
5.负责不同的任务
6.一切准备就绪
7.努力做某事
8.储备了丰富的知识
9.手握剪刀
根据短文内容，从短文后的选项中选出能填入空白处的最佳选项，选项中有两项为多余选项。Lost in the PostHow would you feel if the letter you penned carefully and posted to your favorite star ended up in the recycling bin? That's where unopened fan mail sent to singer Taylor Swift was found in Nashville.1.Swift’s management said it was an accident, but dealing with piles of letters is a burden for most public figures. According to the BBC reporter Jon Kelly, at the height of his fame, Johnny Depp was said to receive up to 10,000 letters a week.2.The dawn of the digital age in which public figures with a Twitter account can be messaged directly has made the process easier. The White House says it deals with 20,000 messages addressed to President Barack Obama each day.Some celebrities don’t want letters. In 2008, Beatles drummer Ringo Starr said that he would throw them out because he was too busy.3.Robert Pattinson, star of theTwilightfilms, claims that he reads tonnes and tonnes of letters from fans, which takes up almost all his free time.Many artists, however, outsource(外包) the task of opening, reading and replying. Sylvia “Spanky” Taylor, 58, has run a service in California that does just that since 1987.4.Most letters are simply declarations of affection and admiration, she says. A few ask for money. A small number contain threats which require her to contact the celebrity’s security team and law enforcement.The biggest problem for Taylor is working out how to deal with the correspondence(通信). Presents such as soft toys are sent to local hospitals, and most of the letters just get shredded and recycled.5.For some, this is enough, according to Lynn Zubernis, an expert at West Chester University. She says that the relationship between fan and celebrity may exist only in the mind of the former but it comes from a deeply-rooted human need for community.
A. This incident has caused a wide public concern about how the public figures deal with the letters or mails from the fans. |
B. She and her staff deal with up to 20,000 items of mail a month on behalf of 26 celebrities |
C. Accordingly, the correspondence problem has been difficult for the computer to automate. |
D. Typically, correspondence is acknowledged by a photo with a printed “signature”. |
E. How could he have enough time to skim through these letters one by one? |
F. In fact, there is no alternative to deal with the problem. |
G. Others do attempt to get through it themselves. |
Hey, You Looking at Me?
The renowned Spanish magician and magic theorist Juan Tamariz wrote in his classic book that to make an audience feel seen, a performer must extend “imaginary threads from the performer’s eyes to the spectators,” taking care to not break them during the performance.
A new study, published earlier this month, suggests that for spectators to feel that they have eye-to-eye contact with the person onstage, the latter needs not extend imaginary threads from his or her eyes to the eyes of the audience. In fact, we perceive direct eye contact from other people not only when they look us in the eye, but also when they look at any other part of our face.
Shane Rogers, Oliver Guidetti, and their collaborators at Edith Cowan University in Perth, set out to determine whether people experience an ‘eye contact illusion’ during natural conversation, and if so, how strong the misperception might be. They conducted two eye-tracking studies:
In the first experiment, Guidetti engaged in one on one ‘getting acquainted’ conversations with 46 students, with both Guidetti and the student wearing eye-tracking glasses. In one half of the 4-minute conversations, Guidetti looked at the student’s eyes most of the time, and in the other half of the conversations, he looked at the student’s mouth most of the time. The data showed that, whereas mutual face gazing was comparable in the two participant groups, mutual eye contact was much lower. Once the conversation was over, students rated how much eye contact they believed Guidetti had made, and how much they had enjoyed the conversation. Both subject groups produced equivalently high ratings in each measure, indicating that our perception of eye contact during conversation has more to do with mutual face gazing than with actual eye contact.
In the second experiment, 36 pairs of students (all wearing eye-tracking goggles) participated in an ‘eye gaze guessing game,’ where participants alternated the roles of gazer and guesser for 30 experimental trials. In each trial, the gazer looked for about 2 seconds at one of five locations on the guesser’s face: eyes, mouth, nose, forehead, or either ear. Then, the guesser tried to guess the location the gazer had just looked at. The guessers’ accuracy was above chance level, suggesting that people do possess some ability to figure out the location of another person’s gaze when actively watching out for it. However, participants were slanted to guessing ‘eyes’ when unsure.
Based on the combined findings from both experiments, the researchers concluded that, unless people are specifically attending to gaze location, they are not very sensitive to the exact focus of their partner’s gaze upon their face during the course of natural conversation.
The bad news is, your perception of soul-to-soul eye contact with your romantic partner may be all in your head (your soulmate could be looking at your mouth, or even your ear, as they declare their everlasting love). But the good news is, if the act of looking at other people’s eyes makes you anxious, or if you dread speaking in front of an audience, you don’t need to sweat the small stuff. Just look in the general direction of people’s faces and it’ll feel to them like meaningful eye contact. (Feb 22th, 2019, Scientific American)
1.What does the underlined word slanted probably mean?
A.certain B.likely
C.doubtful D.frustrated
2.In the first experiment, the participants ________.
A.are trying to get to know each other
B.look at the eyes in half of the conversation
C.misjudge the actual amount of eye contact
D.make more face gazing to reduce embarrassment
3.We can learn from the experiments that ________.
A.The gazer takes at least ten seconds to finish each trail
B.Eye contact makes participants enjoy conversations more
C.They are conducted to prove the significance of imaginary threads
D.People can be accurate about the exact focus of others5 gaze if focused
4.Guidetti probably agrees that ________.
A.Soulful declaration of love doesn’t exist
B.Direct eye contact may cause anxiety
C.Mutual face gazing improves conversation quality
D.Eye contact illusion can be applied to real life
