满分5 > 高中英语试题 >

Where does the conversation probable tak...

Where does the conversation probable take place?

A. In a classroom. B. In a library. C. In a bookshop.

 

C 【解析】 W: Excuse me, Sir. Where did you find this book? M: I can give it to you if you want. I’ve changed my mind and don’t want to buy it anymore. W: Oh, thanks very much, Sir. 此为听力题,解析略。  
复制答案
考点分析:
相关试题推荐

How much should the woman pay?

A. $8. B. $10. C. $12.

 

查看答案

What is the weather probably like now?

A. Dry. B. Windy. C. Rainy.

 

查看答案

假设你是红星中学学生李华, 这学期你加入了学校的英语阅读沙龙并收获颇丰。 最近你收到负责沙龙活动的外教 Jim 的群发邮件,请阅读该邮件, 并给他回复。 回信需包括你收到邮件的感受,以及你对外教所提问题的建议。

 

Dear members,

I am afraid I won’t be able to run our reading club next semester, as I was asked to teach another class on Thursday afternoon—the same time our club usually meets. Besides, it seems we do not have enough people joining this club, although some students did ask about registering. If you really want to keep this club, can you think of any suggestions? Please write to me soon.

Yours,

Jim

Dear members,

I am afraid I won’t be able to run our reading club next semester, as I was asked to teach another class on Thursday afternoon—the same time our club usually meets. Besides, it seems we do not have enough people joining this club, although some students did ask about registering. If you really want to keep this club, can you think of any suggestions? Please write to me soon.

Yours,

Jim

(请务必将作文写在答题卡指定区域内)

________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

查看答案

AlphaZero--an Updated Model of AI

Soon after Garry Kasparov, the former world chess champion, lost his rematch against IBM’s Deep Blue in 1997, the short window of human-machine chess competition slammed shut forever. Unlike humans, machines keep getting faster, and today a smartphone chess app can be stronger than Deep Blue. However, as people see with the new AlphaZero system, machine dominance has not ended the historical role of chess as a laboratory of cognition.

Much as airplanes don’t flap their wings like birds, machines don’t produce chess moves like humans do. Based on a generic algorithm (算法), AlphaZero incorporates deep learning and other AI techniques like Monte Carlo tree search to play against itself to develop its own chess knowledge. Unlike the traditional program Stockfish, which employs many preset evaluation functions as well as opening and endgame moves, AlphaZero starts out knowing only the rules of chess, with no preset human strategies. In a few hours, it plays more games against itself than have been recorded in human chess history. It teaches itself the best way to play, reevaluating the relative values of the pieces. It quickly becomes strong enough to win 28, draw 72, and lose none in a victory over Stockfish. Since AlphaZero can program itself, this superior understanding allows it to outclass the world’s top traditional program despite calculating far fewer positions per second. It’s the typical example of the cliché, “work smarter, not harder”.

AlphaZero shows that machines can be the experts, not merely expert tools. Explainability is still an issue—it’s not going to put chess coaches out of business just yet. But the knowledge it produces is information humans can learn from. AlphaZero is surpassing humans in a profound and useful way, and researchers are working on transferring the knowledge acquired from AlphaZero to other fields.

Machine learning systems aren’t perfect. Even though great progresses have been achieved, AI algorithms are still struggling on open problems such as computer vision, natural language understanding... There will be cases where an AI will fail to detect exceptions to its rules. Therefore, as Kasparov writes, “We must work together to combine our strengths. I know better than most people what it’s like to compete against a machine. Instead of raging against them, it’s better if we’re all on the same side.”

Questions 1-5: Judge if the following statements agree with the information given in the passage.

Choose A for TRUE if the statements agree with it; choose B for FALSE if the statements don’t agree with it; choose C for NOT GIVEN if the information the statements carry is not mentioned anywhere in the passage.根据文章内容判断下列表述。如果表述与文章内容一致,选 A 项;表述与文章内容不一致,选 B 项;文章中未提及的信息,则选 C 项。

Questions 6-9: Choose the correct headings for Paragraphs 1-4 from the box. Note that there are two choices more than you need.请为文章的四段匹配小标题,从AF中选择。(提示:6个选项中有2项是多余的)

A. The proper attitude to AI

B. The history of AlphaZero

C. The limitations of machines

D. The influences of AlphaZero

E. The working theory of AlphaZero

F. The fast development of machines

1.Machine dominance plays an important role in cognition study.

2.AlphaZero knows opening and endgame moves before playing.

3.AlphaZero develops chess strategies by playing against itself.

4.Chess coaches have already been laid off throughout the world.

5.Sometimes artificial intelligence may not discover exceptions to its rules.

6.Paragraph 1

7.Paragraph 2

8.Paragraph 3

9.Paragraph 4

10.The author uses the underlined sentence in the last paragraph to ______.

A. argue for the advantages of AI over humans

B. inform readers of machine dominance in chess

C. advise people to work together to fight against AI

D. call on people to combine strengths with the machines

 

查看答案

A Letter that Changed My Life

I was about 30 years old and was working as a firefighter in the South Bronx’s Engine Co. 82. It was a restful Sunday and between alarms I rushed to the office to read a copy of the New York Times. I read an article on the Book Review section which openly stated what I took to be a calumny – that William Butler Yeats had gone beyond his Irishness and was forever to be known as a universal poet. As I read it, my blood began to boil.

There were few things I was more proud of than my Irish heritage, and ever since I first picked up a book of his poems from a shelf when I was in the military, Yeats had been my favorite Irish writer, followed by Sean O’Casey and James Joyce.

I grabbed a piece of paper and wrote out a letter of anger to the editor. Throughout Yeats’ poetry, his view of the world and the people in it was basically Irish. He had lived his life and written his poetry through the very essence of his Irish sensibility. It was offensive to think Irishness was something to be transcended(超越).

I don’t know why I felt it my duty to safeguard the reputation of the world’s greatest poet. I just knew that I had to write that letter.

After my letter got published, I received a letter from The New Yorker, asking for an interview. When my article Fireman Smith appeared in that magazine, the editor of a large publishing firm called me, asking if I was interested in writing a book about my life. I had little confidence to write a whole book, though the subject was worthy. I wrote Report From Engine Co. 82 in six months, and it sold really well. In the years that followed, I wrote three more best-sellers.

Being a writer had been far from my expectations. How had it happened? I often found myself thinking about it, and my thoughts always came back to that letter to the New York Times. For me, the writing was a natural consequence of the passion I felt and the subjects represented the great values burning within me as I wrote.

Over the years, my five children have come to me with one dilemma or another. My answer is always the same. Think about what you’re feeling and measure the heat of the fire in your heart, for that is your passion. Your education and your experience will guide you toward making a right decision, but your passion will enable you to make a difference in whatever you do. That’s what I learned the day I stood up for Ireland’s greatest poet.

1.Why did the author write to New York Times?

A. To present his love for literature.

B. To spread Irish culture to the world.

C. To prove he has brilliant writing skills.

D. To defend the reputation of an Irish poet.

2.According to the author, what is the key to his success in writing?

A. His skills in arguing. B. His experience as a firefighter.

C. His passion in writing. D. His educational background.

3.The underlined word “calumny” in Paragraph 1 shows ______.

A. a positive feeling

B. a negative feeling

4.Write down the evidence (at least two) from the passage to support your idea.

_______________________________________________________________________________

 

查看答案
试题属性

Copyright @ 2008-2019 满分5 学习网 ManFen5.COM. All Rights Reserved.