It was a bright， clear February afternoon in Gettysburg （葛底斯堡）． A strong sun and layers of warm clothes did little to ease the biting cold． From the top of Little Round Top， we looked down on the wheat field where the young men fighting there had fallen so close together that one could not see the ground． A frozen wind whipped tears from our eyes． Despite the cold， it was hard to leave this place．
Driving east out of Gettysburg on a country road， the gray car ahead of us ran into a small truck on the passenger side when it tried to take a left turn at a rural crossroad． We immediately pulled over to investigate． The driver of the car looked fine，but the truck driver was unconscious and starting to turn blue． A young man from a house at the crossroads called an ambulance．
There were six empty beer bottles on the floor of the truck． I could smell beer through the window． I knew I had to move him to open his airway （气管）．I had no idea what neck injuries he had suffered． He could easily end up paralyzed （瘫痪的）．But he'd be dead before the arrival of the ambulance if I did nothing to help him．
An image flashed before my mind． I could see the truck driver sitting in a wheelchair in the courtroom． I could see his lawyer pointing at me and shouting at title jury： "This young doctor， with still a year left in his residency training， took it upon himself to move this seriously injured man， condemning him forever to this wheelchair…"
What was I going to do？
The response from long hours in the emergency room came to me． I pulled off my overcoat and rolled up my sleeves． The trick would be to keep his head up while I moved his body， so that his probable broken neck and spinal-cord injury wouldn't be made worse．
With Amy's assistance， I lifted him off the window． He was deep blue now； his pulse was rapid． The alcohol turned my stomach， but I tried to blow air down his mouth into his lungs．
Amy brought me a large needle from my car． My numb hands， covered with freezing blood and bits of broken glass，were trying to find the thyroid gland （甲状腺）． It was a lucky first shot． I placed a second needle next to the first． Almost immediately， the driver's face turned bright red． After a minute， his pulse slowed down and his eyes moved slightly． An ambulance approached from the distance．
The ambulance captain took down my name and address for his reports． I had just destroyed my career． I would never be able to finish my residency training if the man put the law on me． My life was over．
The ambulance crew had controlled the bleeding and began giving the truck driver a drip （输液）． He was slowly waking up． As they loaded him into the ambulance， I saw him move his feet． Maybe my future wasn't lost．
A few days later， I went into the office of my senior professor． "You did the right thing medically． But， do you know what you put at risk by doing that？" he said strictly． "What was I supposed to do？" I asked． "Drive on，' he replied． "If that driver had turned out to be paralyzed， you might never practice medicine again． You were a very lucky young man．"
The day I graduated from medical school，I took an oath （誓言）to serve the sick and the injured． I remember truly believing I would be able to do just that． But I have found out it isn't so simple． Despite my oath， I would drive on．
1.What did the writer see when he stopped his car to investigate？ ______
A. The truck driver was fine．
B. The car driver's face was turning red．
C. The truck driver was unconscious．
D. The car driver had drunk much beer．
2.What happened after the truck driver's eyes moved slightly？ ______
A. He was lifted off the window．
B. The writer blew air down his mouth into his lungs．
C. The writer found his thyroid gland．
D. The ambulance crew loaded him into the ambulance．
3.What does the underlined sentence "Maybe my future wasn't lost" mean？ ______
A. The writer wouldn't necessarily be taken to court．
B. The driver was so fortunate．as to be saved by the senior professor．
C. The ambulance crew had given the driver the best treatment．
D. The writer would have a promising career after his residency training．
4.What can we infer from the professor's words？ ______
A. Offering timely help could have taken the writer to court．
B. The unreasonable law against doctors needs to be changed．
C. The writer's unthoughtful kindness wouldn't affect his future．
D. The writer shouldn't have driven on．
5.Which of the following sentences best reflects the theme of the story？ ______
A. You were a very lucky young man．
B. I remember truly believing I would be able to do just that．
C. I could see his lawyer pointing at me and shouting at the jury…
D. I would never be able to finish my residency training if he put law on me．
6.What's the best title of the passage？ ______
A. A professor's warning B. A doctor's dilemma
C. An accident in Gettysburg D. An oath in the court
People asked to imagine how flooding or droughts would affect particular people or places were more likely to engage in environmentally friendly actions．
Many people view climate change as a distant threat． But having them imagine the tangible （有形的） consequences of resulting droughts or floods may help change this idea and encourage proenvironmental behavior， a new study suggests．
Researchers asked 93 college students to read a report on temperature anomalies （异常），floods and other climate change-related events that have affected the island． The scientists then asked 62 of the participants to write down three ways in which such phenomena might impact their future lives． Half the people in that group were instructed to imagine such situations in detail． The remaining 31 students did not complete either the writing or imagining steps， acting as a control group．
All the participants then rated their ideas of climate change risks by responding to questions such as "How likely do you think it is that climate change is having serious impacts on the world？" They used a scale from 1 （"very unlikely"） to 7 （"very likely"）． The average score was higher among subjects who had been asked to envision detailed situations than among those who had not． The results were later confirmed in a second experiment involving 102 participants．
Participants in the first experiment who had imagined the effects of climate change were more likely to say they would use air conditioning in an energy-saving manner． In the second experiment， nearly two thirds of people in the visualizing （想象） group signed up to help clean a beach， compared with 43 percent in the nonvisualizing one． And when offered a choice of a vegetarian （素食主义的）or nonvegetarian lunch box， nearly half the visualizers selected the environmentally friendlier meatless choice-compared with about 28 percent of the nonvisualizers．
The researchers did not track people to see if they behaved differently in their day-to-day lives-something further studies should examine， says study co-author Wen-Bin Chiou． Moreover， the research ''should be done again in other places with other populations，" says Robert Gifford， a professor of psychology at the University of Victoria in British Columbia， who was not involved in the work．
The findings could be applied to raise public concern about climate change， Chiou says． For example， he suggests that news reports about the phenomenon could include vivid descriptions of its effects on people，s lives and ask readers to imagine experiencing such impacts． Having virtual-reality demonstrations （展示）in local science museums of the consequences of climate change would be another way of putting the research into practice， Chiou adds．
1.Which of the following statements about the study is true？ ______
A. Only one experiment was carried out for the study．
B. Professor Robert Gifford played a key role in the study．
C. The control group only completed the writing step in the experiment．
D. Participants asked to imagine detailed effects scored higher than those who weren't．
2.Future studies will probably be about whether ______ ．
A. it is true of other populations in other places
B. more money will be donated to the people affected by climate change-related events
C. people choose vegetarian lunch boxes in their daily lives
D. climate change will cause people to think about joining in a control group
3.To put the research into practice， Wen-Bin Chiou suggests that ______ ．
A. the government call on people to live a low-carbon life
B. people use air conditioning in an energy-saving manner
C. people experience possible effects of climate change through virtual reality facilities
D. news reports provide vivid descriptions of the effects of climate change on peoples5lives
4.The passage mainly tells us that ______ ．
A. different people may have different reactions to climate change
B. different forms of climate change may affect people's ideas in different ways
C. people may change their behavior after thinking about the vivid impacts of climate change
D. college students show great concern for the people affected by climate change
When we see a person in deep sorrow， our immediate reaction is to lend a hand． Not to do so would be a moral failure． But what if we see an animal in deep sorrow， does the same logic apply？
This question was raised following the "rescue" of a group of penguins from an icy gully in Antarctica． It was filmed for the BBC wildlife series Dynasties．
The film crew was alarmed when they saw that a group of penguins had fallen into a gully and been trapped with their young． The crew dug a shallow ramp so that a few of the penguins could save themselves．
The case has taken the international media by storm． Viewers watching this episode let out a sigh of relief on social media． "I'm so glad． I understand not getting directly involved， but a helping hand isn't intervening right？" viewer Kathryn Shaw tweeted．
However， others think that human intervention is unnatural． It's an unwritten rule among documentary filmmakers that they are there to observe， not to intervene， according to CBS News． For example， in another episode of Dynasties， David the chimpanzee， was left to die after he was filmed being beaten up by other chimps．
"Tragedy is a part of life． You can't have sunshine throughout your life． To have done anything else would only make matters worse and distort （扭曲）the truth，" said the show's creator David Attenborough，according to The Times．
In this case， however， Mike Gunton， the executive producer of the series， said that this was a one-off situation． "There were no animals going to suffer by intervening． It wasn't dangerous． You weren't touching the animals and it was just felt by doing this…they had the opportunity to not have to keep slipping down the slope，" he told the BBC．
Such cases are familiar to Paul Nicklen， wildlife photographer for National Geographic．
"I have a practical view when it comes to the natural rhythm （节律）of life，" he told Metro． "If it's ever a dangerous situation， no matter how gut-wrenching， you stay out of the way． Even when you are watching a male polar bear eat the young．"
But he said that he would help animals if he saw no real gain or disruption （扰乱） to the ecosystem．
Indeed， there will always be two sides to the coin， and human beings will forever be conflicted in such circumstances． "There's no rule book in those situations． You can only respond to the facts that are right there in front of you，" Will Lawson， the show's director， told Daily Mail．
1.The case has taken the international media by storm because ______ ．
A. people all over the world prefer documentaries of Antarctica
B. people were very curious about how the penguins died
C. what the film crew did upset people all over the world
D. it has caused a heated discussion on human intervention in wildlife
2.The underlined word "gut-wrenching" in Paragraph 9 probably means ______ ．
A. highly embarrassing B. slightly worrying
C. very comforting D. extremely upsetting
3.From this essay， we can learn that human intervention ______ ．
A. is a topic rarely mentioned by international media
B. once resulted in chimpanzee's death directly
C. is usually not expected in making documentary films
D. surely breaks the natural rhythm of life
Monkeys! A primate story
Until 28 January 2019 Go bananas for the world of primates （灵长类动物）at Queensland Museum's latest exhibition， Monkeys! A Primate Story．
SPECIAL OFFER： From 3-21 December buy a ticket to SparkLab and visit Monkeys for only ﹩5． Present your SparkLab ticket to the ticket desk to buy discounted entry to Monkeys! A Primate Story．
Discounted tickets are available from Monday to Friday only． Ticket must be used on day of purchase and it cannot be used with any other offer， Annual Pass upgrade not included．
Monkeys! is a unique chance to discover a collection that's been over two centuries in the making． Many primate animals are becoming endangered due to human activity， so it's the most important that we understand how a modern， changing world impacts on their environments． How can we make sure the survival of these creatures？ And in turn， how have they succeeded in living in urban environments and facing new challenges？
Ticket Prices
Adult： ﹩12
Child （5-15 years）： ﹩12 Family （2A + 2C）： ﹩40 Annual Pass holder： ﹩10.80
Open time
This exhibition is a timed ticketed experience， and is open daily from 9：40 am to 5：00 pm． Entry times begin at 9：40 am daily， then at 20-minute intervals （间隔）through to the last entry at 4：00 pm．
Season Pass for Annual Pass holders
Do you have an Annual Pass？ When you buy a Monkeys! ticket， you can get a Season Pass to Monkeys! A Primate Story． This means unlimited re-entry to Monkeys! during the exhibition period （29 September 2018 to 28 January 2019）．
It is important to point out that no monkeys were harmed for this exhibition． The primates came from zoos． Protecting endangered primates is a strong theme throughout and a key visitor takeaway．
1.If a couple with two 8-year-old children go to Monkeys! on 26January 2019， how much should they pay altogether at least？ ______
A. ﹩43.2 B. ﹩48
C. ﹩40 D. ﹩20
2.Which of the following statements is NOT true？ ______
A. The entry time is from 9：40 am to 5：00 pm every day．
B. A Season Pass to Monkeys! means unlimited re-entry to it during the exhibition period．
C. The exhibition focuses on the protection of endangered primate animals．
D. Monkeys! provides people with a unique chance to discover a collection．
When his beloved girlfriend left him， he was_______for a couple of weeks．
A. over the moon B. as sly as a fox
C. down in the dumps D. on cloud nine
(2017·北京) Jane moved aimlessly down the tree-lined street, not knowing ______she was heading.
A. why B. where
C. how D. when
