满分5 > 高中英语试题 >

There it was. A test of will power. I’m ...

    There it was. A test of will power. I’m on a special diet with foods carefully selected for balanced nutrition and caloric value. A piece of cheese cake is not an option. So here was my dilemma: Should I not eat the cheese cake, feel dissatisfied and take out my frustration on the annoyingly skinny physical instructor at the gym? Or should I eat the cheese cake and work off the calories?

The latter seemed like a win-win solution. Not only would I get to enjoy the cheese cake, but I’d get an exercise session. And then it hit me: a delicate plan to use my cheese cake as an exercise incentive. I plated a thin slice of cheese cake and carefully walked it up the stairs and set it on my bedside table with a small fork. I put on my exercise outfit and went downstairs.

The appeal of the cheese cake got stronger so I launched my plan: I would run up and down the stairs and then back up again. My reward: one small bite of cheese cake. If I wanted another, I’d have to run down and up and down and up again. Off I went. Ah, creamy vanilla goodness without guilt. I wanted another bite so I quickly sprinted through another stair climbing run.

Admittedly, it is harder to enjoy the creaminess of the cheese cake when my tongue was dry from over-breathing. I placed a bottle of water next to the cake.

Down and up and down and up again. When I struggled over to the cheese cake, my hand bypassed the plate and went for the water instead. I didn’t want the cake any more. I wanted all this sweat and effort to do more than cancel the calories from cheese cake. I was exhausted and sure the cheese cake tasted fine but just not good enough to make me run up and down the stairs one more time.

My plan worked. Now, any time I felt tempted to indulge in a former favorite, I remembered my stairs trick.

1.What can we infer about the author from paragraph 1?

A.She has weak will power.

B.She is bad-tempered and very critical.

C.She needs assistance with making the choice.

D.She hesitated over eating something against her diet.

2.What does the underlined word “incentive” in paragraph 2 mean?

A.Motivation. B.Excuse.

C.Substitute. D.Companion.

3.What do we learn about the author’s plan?

A.It involved much energy consumption.

B.It rid the cake of the pleasant taste.

C.It changed the author’s preference for food.

D.It was exhausting and caused suffering.

4.What may be the best title for the passage?

A.A costly dilemma.

B.An evil cheese cake.

C.A trick that worked.

D.A sweating experience.

 

1.D 2.A 3.A 4.C 【解析】 本文是记叙文。作者非常在意食物的营养和热量值均衡,当面对并不是作者首选的美味的奶酪蛋糕时,作者陷入了两难的境地。后来,她想到一个巧妙的计划,用奶酪蛋糕作为锻炼的动力,通过反复的操作后,作者感觉奶酪蛋糕的诱惑没有开始那么大了,不想再吃蛋糕了。现在,每当她想沉溺于以前的最爱,她就想起了这个微妙的计划。 1.推理判断题。根据第一段中的A piece of cheese cake is not an option. So here was my dilemma: Should I not eat the cheese cake, feel dissatisfied and take out my frustration on the annoyingly skinny physical instructor at the gym? Or should I eat the cheese cake and work off the calories?(奶酪蛋糕不是应该的选择。因此我陷入两难之地:我应该不吃奶酪蛋糕,感到不满足,然后把我的不满发泄在健身房里讨厌的瘦教练身上?还是我应该吃奶酪蛋糕,再消耗掉这些卡路里?)可推知,当面对并不是作者应该选吃的美味的奶酪蛋糕时,作者陷入了两难的境地。由此可知,她对吃违背她的健康饮食的东西时犹豫不决。故选D。 2.词义猜测题。根据第三段中的My reward: one small bite of cheese cake.(我的奖励是:一小口奶酪蛋糕)可推知,划线词所在句And then it hit me: a delicate plan to use my cheese cake as an exercise incentive.句意为“然后我突然想到了一个巧妙的计划:用奶酪蛋糕作为锻炼的奖励”。结合选项:A. Motivation动力;B. Excuse借口;C. Substitute代用品;D. Companion同伴。故选A。 3.细节理解题。根据倒数第二段中的I wanted all this sweat and effort to do more than cancel the calories from cheese cake. I was exhausted and sure the cheese cake tasted fine but just not good enough to make me run up and down the stairs one more time.(我希望所有的汗水和努力不仅仅是抵消奶酪蛋糕的热量。我累坏了,奶酪蛋糕尝起来味道不错,但还不足以让我在楼梯上跑上跑下)可知,作者的这个计划,消耗了她很多热量,把她累坏了。故选A。 4.主旨大意题。根据第二段中的And then it hit me: a delicate plan to use my cheese cake as an exercise incentive.(然后我想到了一个巧妙的计划:用奶酪蛋糕作为锻炼的奖励)及最后一段中的My plan worked.(我的计划奏效了)可知,作者主要介绍了自己面对饮食诱惑时想到的一个巧妙的计划。由此可知,C项A trick that worked(一个有效的伎俩)适合做本文最佳标题。故选C。
复制答案
考点分析:
相关试题推荐

    Eating red meat is linked to cancer and heart disease, but are the risks big enough to justify giving up juicy burgers and delicious steaks? Probably not, according to researchers who reviewed data from 12 clinical trials involving about 54,000 people. In a series of controversial papers, the researchers argue that the increased health risks tied to red meat are small and uncertain, and that cutting back likely wouldn't be worth it for people who enjoy meat.

Those conclusions go against established medical advice. They were swiftly attacked by a group of famous U.S. scientists who took the unusual step of trying to stop the papers from being published until their criticisms were addressed.

The new work does not say red or processed meats like hot dogs and bacon are healthy, or that people should eat more of them. The team’s reviews of past studies generally support the ties to cancer, heart disease and other bad health outcomes. But the authors say the evidence is weak, and that there’s not much certainty meat is really the cause, since other diet and lifestyle factors could be at play.

If the latest example of how divisive nutrition research has become, with its uncertainties leaving the door open for conflicting advice. Critics say findings often aren't backed by strong evidence. Defenders counter that nutrition studies can rarely be conclusive because of the difficulty of measuring the effects of any single food, but that methods have improved.

Based on their analyses, the researchers said people do not have to cut back for health reasons. But they noted that their own advice is weak, and acknowledged that they didn't consider factors such as animal welfare and the environment. Indeed, the case that meat production is bad for animal welfare and the environment is stronger than the case that it's bad for human health, according to an editorial that accompanies the report.

Not all of the report authors agreed with its conclusions. Three of the 14 researchers said they support reducing red and processed meats. A coauthor of one of the reviews is also among those who called for a publication delay.

Those who pushed to postpone publication also questioned why certain studies were included in the reviews while others were left out.

As for his own diet, Dr. Gordon Guyatt, a member of the international research team that conducted the reviews, said he no longer thinks red or processed meats have significant health risks. But he said he still avoids them out of habit, and for animal welfare and environmental reasons.

1.What is the author’s purpose in writing the passage?

A.To introduce a new relationship between health and eating red meat.

B.To urge more people to keep away from eating red meat regularly.

C.To present a new controversial view on impacts of eating red meat.

D.To criticize nutrition studies for lacking of conclusive evidence.

2.What is the author’s attitude towards the new research?

A.Doubtful. B.Positive.

C.Disapproving. D.Objective.

3.Guyatt’s avoiding red meats has the weakest connection with ________.

A.health risks B.diet habits

C.animal welfare D.environmental protection

4.What can we learn from the recent research?

A.Red meats don’t have significant health risks.

B.Reducing meat consumption will be worth it.

C.The report authors have reached a consensus.

D.Consuming red meat will do good to health.

 

查看答案

Traveling by subway ______ sometimes be quite an adventure, especially during the rush hour.

A.must B.can C.shall D.should

 

查看答案

Her companion_____  a trick on her, for she was not in the mood for everything that day.

A.can’t have played B.must have played

C.should have played D.needn’t have played

 

查看答案

You _____ be right but I’m going back to check anyway.

A.should B.must C.need D.might

 

查看答案

—What about seeing the new movie at the theatre tonight?

—Sounds great, but I ____ work extra hours to finish a report.

A.have got to B.am able to

C.am glad to D.am willing to

 

查看答案
试题属性

Copyright @ 2008-2019 满分5 学习网 ManFen5.COM. All Rights Reserved.