When will the boy go to bed?
A.At 9:40. B.At 9:50. C.At 10:10.
What does the woman ask the man?
A.What to wear for a party.
B.Whether to attend a party.
C.How to make friends at a party.
假设你是红星中学高三学生李华。下面四幅图描述了你在家做饭时发生的小意外。请根据以下四幅图的先后顺序，用英语写一篇日记，记述你处理意外的全过程。
注意：词数不少于60。
提示词：煤气炉 gas stove；锅铲 cooking shovel
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
假设你是红星中学的学生会主席李华。近日，学校将为在你校学习的交换生召开一次视频会议。请你代表学生会给交换生们在微信中发一个“群公告”，内容包括：
1. 告知会议时间、内容及目的；
2. 提示做好会前准备。
注意：词数不少于50。
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Procrastination(拖延症) Tech Support
Choosing between immediate satisfaction and future benefit can easily lead to shortsighted decisions: Watching TV instead of going to the gym, for example, or going through social media rather than working on a challenging project. 1.
To guide individuals toward greatest choices, Falk Lieder, a cognitive(认知) scientist, and his colleagues designed a digital tool called a “cognitive prosthesis.” It uses artificial intelligence to match a decision’s immediate reward with its long-term worth after making a to-do list. The researchers developed a set of models and algorithms(算法) that consider various elements such as a list of tasks, an individual’s unwillingness to each and the amount of time available. 2. It helps to encourage that person to complete them all.
The idea was to turn the challenging projects that people pursue in the real world into a game like environment. “The point system gives people achievable goals that signal that they’re making progress.” Lieder says.
3. The results, published online in August in Nature Human Behavior, revealed that the AI support system helped people make better, faster decisions and procrastinate less—and it made them more likely to complete all the assigned tasks. In one experiment, in which the researchers presented 120 participants with a list of several writing assignments. 4.However, the rate was only 56 percent for those not using it.
Lieder says one of the current tool’s limitations is that it can handle only short to-do lists.5. At the same time, they are working with a company called Complice to integrate the tool into an existing to-do list app. The researchers also plan to run field experiments to see how well their cognitive prosthesis succeed in the real world.
A.People often struggle to do what’s best for them in the long run.
B.The team tested this tool in a series of experiments with human subjects.
C.The system then assigns reward points to each task in a way that is customized.
D.And now, he and his team are trying to develop it up for a larger number of tasks.
E.They found that 85 percent of individuals who used the tool completed all their tasks.
F.A study was conducted to find a way to help people increase their decision-making ability.
G.This tool is a convincing demonstration that procrastination is something that this strategy can help with quite a lot.
Don’t Blame Robots for Low Wages
The other day I found myself at a conference discussing declining wages and increasing inequality. One thing that struck me was how many of the participants just assumed that robots are a big part of the problem. But automation just isn’t a big part of the story what happened to American workers over the past 40 years. We do have a big problem, but it has very little to do with technology, and a lot to do with politics and power.
Economically speaking, a robot is anything that uses technology to do work formerly done by human beings. And robots in that sense have been transforming our economy for centuries. David Ricardo, a founding father of economics, wrote about the destructive effects of machinery in 1821. These days, when people talk about the robot destruction, they don’t usually think of things like strip mining(露天采矿) and mountaintop removal(削山开采). Yet these technologies completely transformed coal mining: Coal production almost doubled between 1950 and 2000, yet the number of coal miners fell from 470,000 to fewer than 80,000.
So the destruction brought by technological change is an old story. What’s new is the failure of workers to share in the fruits of that technological change. I’m not saying that coping with change was ever easy. But while there have always been some victims of technological progress, until the 1970s rising productivity translated into rising wages for a great majority of workers. Then the connection was broken. And it wasn’t the robots that did it.
What did? There is a growing agreement among economists that a key factor in wage decreasing has been worker’s declining bargaining power—a decline whose roots are ultimately political. Most obviously, the federal minimum wage has fallen by a third over the past half century, even as worker productivity has risen 150 percent, which rooted in politics, pure and simple.
The decline of unions, which covered a quarter of private-sector workers in 1973 but only 6 percent now, may not be as obviously political. But other countries haven’t seen the same kind of decline. What made America exceptional was a political environment deeply unfriendly to labor organizing and friendly toward union-destroying employers. And the decline of unions has made a huge difference. Consider trucking, which used to be a good job but now pays a third less than it did in the 1970s, with terrible working conditions. What made the difference? Deunionization was a big part of the story.
American workers can and should be getting a much better deal than they are. And to the extent that they aren’t, the fault lies not in our robots, but in our political leader.
1.The people present at the conference about lower wages and increasing inequality _________.
A.believed that robots have contributed to wage decline
B.agreed that robots should be used to help increase wages
C.predicted that lower wages and increasing inequality would relate to robots
D.assumed that lower wages and increasing inequality rooted in politics and power
2.The author mentions the case of the coal mining to show _________.
A.the robot destruction started from coal mining
B.the influence of the technology on jobs is not a new phenomenon
C.the number of jobs increases as a result of technological advancement
D.strip mining and mountaintop removal completely changed the coal mining industry
3.According to the passage, we know that _________.
A.the destructive effects of machinery started in 1821
B.25% of private-sector workers were covered by unions in 1973
C.rising productivity didn’t bring about rising wages until the 1970s
D.the minimum wage has decreased with the dropping of worker productivity
4.What’s the main idea of the passage?
A.Technological changes have resulted in lower wages.
B.Political leaders have intended to shift people’s attention from robots.
C.The decline in wages has resulted from bad policies rather than the application of robots.
D.Technological changes have contributed to rising wages instead of causing unemployment.
