满分5 > 高中英语试题 >

假定英语课上老师要求同桌之间交换修改作文,请你修改你同桌写的以下作文。文中共有1...

假定英语课上老师要求同桌之间交换修改作文,请你修改你同桌写的以下作文。文中共有10处语言错误,每句中最多有两处。每处错误仅涉及一个单词的增加、删除或修改。

增加:在缺词处加一个漏字符号(),并在其下面写出该加的词。

删除:把多余的词用斜线()划掉。

修改:在错的词下画一横线,并在该词下面写出修改后的词。

注意:1.每处错误及其修改均仅限一词;

2.只允许修改10处,多者(从第11处起)不计分。

Five years ago, my father, who was in his forty, lost his job. At first, he was in low spirits and often gets drunk. One day, he read a story about Ren Zhengfei, which was greatly inspired him. He turned to a friend, with which help he set up a factory. In his factory waste materials were made full use to produce environmentally friendly packing bags. With these bags well receiving, his factory went smooth. Now, he has extra money because he often helps those in need. So far, he has donated as many as $10,000. How a great father I have!

 

1. forty→forties 2. gets→got 3.去掉was 4. which→whose 5. use后加of 6. receiving→received 7. smooth→smoothly 8. because→so或and 9. many→much 10. How→What 【解析】 本文是一篇记叙文。五年前作者父亲失业,在朋友的帮助下开工厂,获得成功。目前作者父亲经常帮助那些需要的人,作者因为有一个伟大的父亲而自豪。 1.考查固定搭配。句意:五年前,我父亲在他四十几岁时失业了。固定搭配:“in one’s +逢10的基数词的复数形式”的意思是“在某人几十几岁时”。故把forty→forties。 2.考查时态。句意:起初,他情绪低落,经常喝酒。这里指五年前的事情,所以句子用一般过去时态,故把gets→got。 3.考查主动语态。句意:一天他读了一个名字叫Ren Zhengfei的故事,这个故事极大地鼓舞了他。此处“故事鼓舞他”是主动,所以句子用主动语态,故把was去掉。 4.考查定语从句。句意:他向一个朋友求助,在朋友的帮助下他建立了一个工厂。此处friend是先行词,指人,在后面的定语从句中作定语修饰名词help,故答案为whose。 5.考查固定词组。固定词组:make full use of“充分利用”。故在use后加of。 6.考查with的独立主格结构。句意:这些包受到好评,工厂进展顺利。此处是with的独立主格结构,“with+宾语+过去分词” ,bags 和 receive之间是被动关系,故把receiving→received。 7.考查词形转换。句意:工厂进展顺利。此处went是动词,有副词来修饰,故把smooth→smoothly。 8.考查并列连词。句意:现在他有了额外的钱,所以他帮助那些需要的人。故把because→so或and。 9.考查many和much的用法。句意:到目前为止,他捐献的钱多达$10,000。many修饰可数名词复数,而much修饰不可数名词,此处表示捐献的“钱数”,是不可数名词,故把many→much。 10.考查感叹句。此处中心词是father,是名词,所以由what引导感叹句,而how修饰形容词或副词。故把How→What。
复制答案
考点分析:
相关试题推荐

阅读小面短文,在空白处填入1个适当的档次或括号内单词的正确形式。

By now it’s almost common knowledge that spending time in nature is good for you. Areas with 1.(many) trees tend to be less polluted, so spending time there allows you to breathe easier. Spending time outdoors contributes to good health, with blood pressure and stress 2.(reduce), and seems to motivate people 3.(exercise) more.

A survey showed that people 4.spend 2 hours in nature — either all at once or totaled over several shorter 5.(visit) — were more likely to report good health and psychological well-being than those with no nature 6.(expose). Remarkably, the researchers found that less than two hours offered no significant benefits. The two-hour benchmark (临界值) 7.(apply) to men and women, to older and younger folks and so on. Even people8.long-term illnesses or disabilities benefited from time 9.(spend) in nature — as long as it was at least 120 minutes per week.

While the findings are based on 10.tremendous number of people, scientists caution that it’s really just a correlation. Nobody knows why or how nature has this benefit or even if the findings will stand up to stricter investigation.

 

查看答案

The View from the Slow Lane

As we pulled into the driveway, I noticed that something seemed different about my mom. She was _______away from me, her shoulders dropped and her hands relaxed. I parked the car and she turned toward me.

“Okay, we’re home,” I said, _______that now was her time to get out and let me be on my own. She sniffled and brushed her hair behind her ears to reveal her bloodshot eyes and moist cheeks. She had been crying.

“Mom!” I whined (嘀咕着说), surprised by the tears running down her face. “Why are you crying?” I asked, _______I already knew the answer.

I had just got my _______, which I’d been looking forward to for months. I was free — able to drive myself where I needed to go. But now that I had it in my pocket, I suddenly felt _______. I had been so quick to grow up, completely ignoring the emotions that my mom must be experiencing with her firstborn _______adulthood.

“My baby boy is growing up too fast,” she _______to say between deep breaths.

My heart ached. I hated to see my mom cry, and I hated more that I had been so ignorant toward her _______. I had been counting down the days,_______waiting to enter the next stage of my life, ________she counted down with fear and headache. The ________and freedom I had previously felt were gone, replaced by an odd sense of mourning.

We hugged. Then she looked me in the eye and told me to drive carefully. “Of course I will,” I reassured her. She unbuckled her seat belt, opened the door, and stepped out. I waved goodbye and pulled out of the driveway.

I had been so ________to start speeding and skirting around corners that I’d ________just how beautiful the ride is. Now I cruised (漫游) down the peaceful two -lane road, ________the sights, sounds, and smells of the nature that surrounds me. At that moment I made a promise to myself, a promise to take things ________and to never, never, catch myself speeding again.

Life had passed me by while I lived my days in fast ________, ignorantly wishing for tomorrow and ________to notice all the beautiful things along the way. Friendships, victories, heartbreaks — have sped by me because I was too busy looking toward the ________. It seems life also has its own ________, and if you find yourself going too fast, you risk ________ the moments that make it so special.

Moments like this.

1.A.facing B.running C.escaping D.breaking

2.A.implying B.fearing C.asking D.considering

3.A.in that B.now that C.even though D.as though

4.A.car B.license C.offer D.scholarship

5.A.anxious B.guilty C.annoyed D.disappointed

6.A.nearing B.spending C.crossing D.delaying

7.A.tried B.intended C.managed D.decided

8.A.waiting B.warning C.greetings D.feelings

9.A.unwillingly B.nervously C.impatiently D.thankfully

10.A.while B.and C.for D.so

11.A.luck B.delight C.honor D.gratitude

12.A.afraid B.confident C.excited D.reluctant

13.A.denied B.forgotten C.realized D.discovered

14.A.following B.imagining C.enjoying D.recognizing

15.A.easy B.wrong C.personal D.slow

16.A.forward B.downward C.backward D.upward

17.A.trying B.refusing C.pretending D.failing

18.A.fortune B.scenery C.past D.future

19.A.fast track B.speed limit C.comfort zone D.daily routine

20.A.deleting B.wasting C.losing D.missing

 

查看答案

    Let's face it: The last hour of anyone's workday is not always fruitful. As the hours of peak productivity start to decline, most people begin watching the clock, waiting for nothing.1.“How positively you end your professional day can promote success both inside and outside of the office,” says Randi Levin, a transitional life strategist. Let's see how successful people end their workday with a bang.

Successful people reflect on their accomplishments. While many of us spend our last hour of work making a to-do list for tomorrow, they review the day they just had, instead.2.Similarly, Levin recommends writing down the day's wins rather than setbacks or to-dos, as well as reviewing your list of successes once a month. It will prove your professional growth and bring more joy into your job.

Also, successful people brainstorm solutions for today's setbacks.3.Instead, they end their day by thinking carefully about the problems they met, brainstorming possible solutions, and then leaving it for tomorrow. They will settle those problems after a good night's sleep.

4.Rather than detailing the tasks that need to get done, this kind of list encourages people to focus on finding solutions for their projects. “Forget the horrible 'to-do' list,” Levin says, “before heading to happy hour, write down three to five goals you have for the next 24 hours.5.It will provide you with not only a concrete and positive way to begin tomorrow, but also it will allow you to see much more possibilities.”

A.This list is a promise to yourself.

B.Successful people make a to-do list.

C.It will make people understand the problems better.

D.They never bring the day's failures home with them.

E.Another work these people do is to create an action list.

F.But ending the workday with purpose can make a difference.

G.They typically choose a case and consider what led to that success.

 

查看答案

Camaraderie over Competence

The importance of liking people is the subject of an article in the Harvard Business Review, which has carried out an experiment to find out who we’d rather work with. Hardly surprisingly, the people we want most as our workmates are both: brilliant at their jobs and delightful human beings. And the people we want least are both unpleasant and useless. More interestingly, the authors found that, given the choice between working with lovable fools and competent jerks (性情古怪的人), we irresistibly choose the former. Anyway, who likes those stupid men who annoy or hurt other people? We might insist that competence matters more, but our behavior shows we stay close to the people we like and sharing information with them.

What companies should therefore do is get people to like each other more. The trick here is apparently to make sure staffs come across each other as often as possible during the day. They also should be sent on bonding courses and so on to encourage friendliness and break down displeasure. However, more outdoor-activity weekends and shared coffee machines inspire no confidence at all.

The reality is that people either like each other or they don’t. You can’t force it. Possibly you can make offices friendlier by tolerating a lot of chat, but there is a productivity cost to that. In my experience, the question of lovable fool against competent jerk may not be the right one. The two are interrelated: we tend not to like our workmates when they are completely hopeless. I was once quite friendly with a woman whom I later worked with. I found her to be so outstandingly bad at her job that I lost respect for her and ended up not really liking her at all. Then is there anything that companies should be doing about it?

By far the most effective strategy would be to hire people who are all pretty much the same, given that similarity is one of the main determinants of whether we like each other. I think this is a pretty good idea, but no one dares recommend this anymore without offending the diversity lobby group. There is only one acceptable view on this subject: teams of similar people are bad because they stop creativity. This may be true, though I have never seen any conclusive proof of it.

Not only do we like similar people, we like people who like us. So if companies want to promote more liking, they should encourage a culture where we are all nice to each other. The trouble is that this needs to be done with some skill.

1.According to the research, which kind of colleagues would most people tend to choose?

A.Nice but unintelligent.

B.Creative but unattractive.

C.Competent but unfriendly.

D.Humorous but unambitious.

2.The author talks about her experience to show that ______.

A.people respect outstanding leaders

B.people tend to like optimistic workmates

C.a workmate’s working ability is important

D.talkative workmates makes offices friendlier

3.Some people think that similar people working together may ______

A.offend each other

B.create fewer new ideas

C.talk more and work less

D.be likely to stick together

4.To encourage workmates to like each other, companies could ______.

A.set more coffee machines in the work place

B.organize team-building activities outside the office

C.encourage a diversity of opinions in workplace

D.employ staff who have a lot in common

 

查看答案

    Smart cities are coming. And you can be sure that hackers(黑客) won’t be very far behind.

We’ve already gotten a glimpse of that future, as cities across the globe start to use technology to connect their services and residents in ways that was science fiction just a few years ago. They are using sensors to collect data — such as traffic, garbage collecting, and road conditions —and then using that data to deliver services to more people and more efficiently.

But this rush to become a smart city has a major drawback: The more connected a city is, the easier it is to cyber-attacks. Hackers have, in recent years, effectively held cities hostage through ransom ware(赎金器), sometimes damaging critical systems for months at a time. The damage can cost millions to repair, as Baltimore and Atlanta have discovered.

And this is just the beginning. As cities add connectivity to their streetlights, power grids, dams, transit lines and other services, they are adding more targets that have the potential to be hacked. What’s more, as additional information on residents is collected, officials worry the result —lots of data could attract nation-states or terrorists who could incorporate the data into physical and cyber war.

What cyber security lesson can’t be taught in this hack? For example: Don’t open email attachments from unfamiliar sources; don’t click on unrecognized links; don’t leave sensitive information visible on the walls or surfaces of your office. But let’s just stick to the most important lesson: The information you share on social media can be used to profile and target you, whether that’s by engineering click bait(点击诱饵) aimed at your particular interests, guessing your password based on your birthday or figuring out your schedule and travels so that an intruder can access your home or office.

Wednesday, September 18, 2019 THE WALL STREET JOURNAL.

1.What did people use to think of smart cities?

A.It was the product of science. B.It was bound to be popular.

C.It existed in imagination. D.It improved people’s life.

2.What does the author intend to do in Paragraph 3?

A.Introduce the harm of hackers. B.Show the danger of a smart city.

C.Add some background information. D.Summarize the previous paragraphs.

3.What is officials’ attitude to big data?

A.It is convenient to provide service. B.It is certain to bring about revolution.

C.There are actually potential dangers. D.There’s competition in high technology.

4.What does the underlined word "profile" in Para. 5 mean?

A.Describe. B.Protect. C.Pursue. D.Fund.

 

查看答案
试题属性

Copyright @ 2008-2019 满分5 学习网 ManFen5.COM. All Rights Reserved.